Top Articles
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Legal > Patents > Patents In India - Interpreting The Claim Language

Tags

  • product
  • expert
  • cycle
  • inventor testimony
  • developing combination
  • inventor testimony

  • Links

  • What You Should Know About Fat Loss Before You Start A Self Program Of Dieting or Exercise
  • B2B Sales - Establishing Credibility with Referrals & References
  • Business Ethics Case Study Considered; Franchise Regulations
  • Top Articles - Patents In India - Interpreting The Claim Language

    To get acquainted with the patent claim drafting is a difficult task and the general trend prevailing during the examination process and the court’s observation has to be analyzed and understood before
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    one start writing claims for a patent.

    Claims must be read or construed in the light of, or in connection with claim language, the specifications and the prosecution history.

    The meaning of the claims
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    in issue must be determined by a study of all relevant patent documents. The relevant patent documents include the intrinsic evidence of claim language, specification and prosecution history.

    Claim Lan
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    uage: It is that language that the patentee chose to use to make a distinct claim over the subject matter of the invention. A claim is never a specification embodiment, but a separate body which extends
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    the scope of protection. The ordinary language of the claims can be attributed to that of a person skilled in relevant art. Hence a claim language must disclose a single and clear definition of claim sc
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    pe,

    Specification: It is ideal for the presiding officers to interpret the claims to consult the specifications and prosecution history to understand the meaning of the terms to one of skill in the art
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    at the time of invention. The proper examination of the claims, the specification, and the prosecution history would serve as the tools for the proper interpretation of the claims.

    Specification as suc
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    h can be best treated as a dictionary as it provides the explicit and implicit meanings of claim terms and it is the best guide to the meaning of a disputed term. From popular cases like Grain Processin
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    Corp. v. American Maize-Products Co. and Teledyne McCormick Selph v. U. S., it is evidently clear that patent claims are to be construed in the light of the specifications and both are to be read with
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    a view to ascertaining the invention. The patent specifications must be looked to in the interpretive process of ascertaining the scope of the claimed invention. (U.S.--Interdent Corp. v. U. S.(1976)),
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    Prosecution History: Prosecution history can provide clarification regarding the patentee's understanding of the invention and can be of primary significance in construing the scope and meaning of claim
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    terms. The prior art contains express definitions of claim terms that are considered highly pertinent during prosecution, these definitions may override the ordinary meaning of claim language.

    Apart fr
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    m above some external factors such as all evidence external to the patent and prosecution history, including expert and inventor testimony, dictionaries, and leaned treatises. This evidence may be helpf
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    l to explain scientific principles, the meaning of technical terms, and terms of art that appear in the patent and prosecution history. In case the dependence on the evidences like claim language, speci
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    fication, prosecution history fails to tell the meaning it would be ideal to go for the external evidences like expert testimony, inventor testimony, prior art mentioned in the records, publication and
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    peeches to provide the meaning. The other external evidences like admissions in discovery responses, internal documents and scientific publications. Technical treatises and dictionaries can not be categ
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    rized as patent documents but for better understanding they used to be consulted. Still their significance is not enough to override the evidences like claim language, specification and prosecution hist
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    ry to interpret a claim. So far as patent specification acts as a dictionary it defines terms used in the claims and as stated above the specification is the best guide to the meaning of a disputed term
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de


    A clear message is conveyed to the inventors to make their claim more unambiguous, plain speaking, meant to protect the scope of their invention at any cost. Hence precautions have to be taken by them
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    while they write specifications and claims. They have to be aware of the principles taken into account while construing the claim language which otherwise may damage the chances for a prospective patent


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.toparticles.org.ua/article/130743/toparticles-Patents-In-India--Interpreting-The-Claim-Language.html">Patents In India - Interpreting The Claim Language</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.toparticles.org.ua/article/130743/toparticles-Patents-In-India--Interpreting-The-Claim-Language.html]Patents In India - Interpreting The Claim Language[/url]

    Related Articles:

    What Some Pros Know About PR

    Unknowingly, Many Of Us Are Becoming Internet Marketing Research Companies

    Simplify Your Finances

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com